Author: Ayda Grisiute

A new paper, titled “Spatial Nudging: Converging Persuasive Technologies, Spatial Design, and Behavioral Theories”, was presented at the 16th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2024).

This paper introduces the Spatial Nudging framework—a theory-driven approach that maps out nudging strategies in the mobility domain, with a focus on cycling. The framework integrates physical and digital interventions to promote sustainable mobility, drawing from behavioral theories such as Nudge Theory and the Theory of Affordances. Additionally, we propose a graph-based workflow that uses cognitive graphs and the Fine-to-Coarse heuristic to model how cyclists perceive their environment. This method generates cognitive routes that align perceived affordances with the physical environment, closely resembling real-world cycling trajectories.

For more details, check out our paper!

Ayda Grisiute gave a talk at the 8th Cycling Research Board Meeting (CRBAM). The presentation, titled “Conceptualizing Spatial Nudging: A Theoretical Framework for Integrating Interventions to Promote Cycling“ introduced Spatial Nudging framework that delineates nudging practices in the mobility domain and offers a theoretically integrated perspective on promoting cycling through spatial interventions.

In addition, Ayda presented a poster titled “Building a Planning Tool for the E-Bike City Vision,” which showcased a web application created by two geomatics students. The tool helps urban planners reallocate road space for bike lanes using various optimization strategies.

Check out the poster here!

As the ecosystem of transport planning and evaluation metrics, tools, methods, and services grows, there is a pressing need to enhance domain interoperability and interpretability. In our new paper, titled “An ontology-based approach for harmonizing metrics in bike network evaluations“ , we construct a formal ontology, VeloNEMO, a formal ontology designed to capture the key attributes of bike network evaluation metrics and resolve terminological inconsistencies across them. We also introduce a machine-readable knowledge graph that compiles existing metrics, allowing for more efficient meta-analyses of various evaluation strategies. To further enhance transparency, we offer recommendations for making metric descriptions more comparable across different evaluation approaches.

For more details, check out our paper!